18 C.F.R. § 154.106
Map
(a) The tariff must state a uniform resource locator on the pipeline's Internet Web site, at which the general public may display and download system map(s).
(b) The map must show the general geographic location of the company's principal pipeline facilities and of the points at which service is rendered under the tariff. The boundaries of any rate zones or rate areas must be shown and the areas or zones identified. The entire system should be displayed on a single map. In addition, a separate map should be provided for each zone.
(c) The map must be revised to reflect any major change no later than the end of the calendar quarter that immediately follows the calendar quarter in which the major change occurred.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1977–1982 · leading case: Shutts v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 567 P.2d 1292 (Kan. 1977).
Shutts v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 567 P.2d 1292 (Kan. 1977). “(See 18 C.F.R. § 154.106 [g].) The lessee’s interest in Althea Shutts’ two leases was owned by Phillips Petroleum Company which operated five producing gas wells.”
Mary Gladys Bowers v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 692 F.2d 1015 (5th Cir. 1982). “From the date that natural gas has been produced for sale from the plaintiffs’ properties, the applicable FPC opinions and provisions of the Natural Gas Policy Act, imposing maximum price ceilings on sales under the Phillips-Natural contract, are as follows: from January 24,…”
Kaiser-Francis Special Account C v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n, 675 F.2d 249 (10th Cir. 1982). “586, codified in 18 C.F.R. § 154.106 , authorizing higher area rates for the Hugoton-Anadarko area in which the Harper County production facilities are located.”
Bowers v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 526 F. Supp. 1320 (N.D. Tex. 1981). “586, codified at 18 C.F.R. § 154.106 (1980). Under Opinion No.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.