18 C.F.R. § 154.111

Index of customers

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) If a pipeline is in compliance with the reporting requirements of § 284.13(c) of this chapter, then an index of customers need not be provided in the tariff.

(b) If all of a pipeline's jurisdictional transportation and sales are pursuant to part 157 of this chapter, then an index of customers must be provided that contains: a list of the pipeline's firm transportation, storage, and sales customers, and the rate schedule number for the services for which the shippers are contracting; the effective date of the contract; the expiration date of the contract; if the service is transportation or sales, the maximum daily contract demand under the contract; and, if the service is storage, the maximum storage quantity. Specify units of measurement when reporting contract quantities.

(c) The index of customers must be kept current by filing new or revised sheets or sections, semi-annually. One filing must coincide with the filing of the natural gas company's FERC Form No. 2 or 2-A with a proposed effective date of June 1. The other filing must be made six months later with a proposed effective date of December 1. The Index of Customers must contain a list of the contracts in effect as of the filing date.

[Order 582, 60 FR 52996, Oct. 11, 1995, as amended by Order 637, 65 FR 10219, Feb. 25, 2000; Order 714, 73 FR 57535, Oct. 3, 2008]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1989–1999 · leading case: Exxon Corp. v. United States, 45 Fed. Cl. 581 (Fed. Cl. 1999).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Exxon Corp. v. United States, 45 Fed. Cl. 581 (Fed. Cl. 1999). “595, supra), codified at 18 C.F.R. § 154.111 (1971) (establishing Texas Gulf Coast pricing, effective August 1, 1971 through December 31, 1975); Opinion No.”

Trunkline Gas Co. v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n, 880 F.2d 546 (D.C. Cir. 1989). · cites it 2× “18 CFR § 154.111 (a)(2); see also [1982-85 Reg.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.