18 C.F.R. § 4.91

[Reserved]

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1984–1988 · leading case: Nat'l Wildlife Fed'n v. Consumers Power Co., 862 F.2d 580 (6th Cir. 1988).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Nat'l Wildlife Fed'n v. Consumers Power Co., 862 F.2d 580 (6th Cir. 1988). · cites it 2× “50(b)(1) (1983); 18 C.F.R. 4.91(c) (1983). In our view, the Ludington facility is a dam for purposes of the CWA, since it is a "structure that impounds water.”

Tulalip Tribes v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n, 732 F.2d 1451 (9th Cir. 1984). “50 (b)(1) (1983) (“ ‘Dam’ means any structure for impounding or diverting water”); 18 C.F.R. § 4.91 (c) (1983) (“ ‘Dam’ means any structure that impounds water”).”

— 18 C.F.R. § 4.91(c) — 1 case

Nat'l Wildlife Fed'n v. Consumers Power Co., 862 F.2d 580 (6th Cir. 1988). “50(b)(1) (1983); 18 C.F.R. 4.91(c) (1983). In our view, the Ludington facility is a dam for purposes of the CWA, since it is a "structure that impounds water.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.