C.F.R. » Title 19 » CHAPTER I—U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY › PART 10—ARTICLES CONDITIONALLY FREE, SUBJECT TO A REDUCED RATE, ETC. › Subpart A—General Provisions

19 C.F.R. § 10.172

Claim for exemption from duty under the Generalized System of Preferences

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

A claim for an exemption from duty on the ground that the Generalized System of Preferences applies shall be allowed by the Center director only if he is satisfied that the requirements set forth in this section and §§ 10.173 through 10.178 have been met. If duty-free treatment is claimed at the time of entry, a written claim shall be filed on the entry document by placing the symbol “A” as a prefix to the subheading of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States for each article for which such treatment is claimed.

[T.D. 76-2, 40 FR 60048, Dec. 31, 1975, as amended by T.D. 77-36, 42 FR 5041, Jan. 27, 1977; T.D. 89-1, 53 FR 51252, Dec. 21, 1988; T.D. 94-47, 59 FR 25569, May 17, 1994; T.D. 99-27, 64 FR 13675, Mar. 22, 1999]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1984–2016 · leading case: Zojirushi Am. Corp. v. United States, 2016 CIT 78 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Zojirushi Am. Corp. v. United States, 2016 CIT 78 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2016). · cites it 6× “172 , which, according to defendant, “provides in relevant part that to obtain duty-free treatment under GSP, ‘a written claim shall be filed on the entry document by placing the symbol “A” as a prefix to the subheading of the [HTSÚS] for each article for which such treatment is…”
Audiovox Corp. v. United States, 598 F. Supp. 387 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1984). “19 C.F.R. § 10.172 . The district director thus could not have granted plaintiff GSP treatment under plaintiff’s original protests as plaintiff failed to satisfy a condition precedent to such treatment.”
United States v. Modes, Inc., 787 F. Supp. 1466 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1992). “§§ 1481 , 1482, 1484, 1485 (1988); 19 C.F.R. §§ 10.172 , 10.173(a), 141.11(a)(1), 142.”
Leather's Best v. United States, 10 Ct. Int'l Trade 321 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1986). · cites it 2× “19 C.F.R. § 10.172 (1982). One of these requirements is evidence of the country of origin, or the waiver of Customs thereof.”
Aurum Jewelers, Inc. v. United States, 21 Ct. Int'l Trade 430 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1997). “50 (1993); see 19 C.F.R. § 10.172 (1993). Plaintiff filed a protest against the liquidation of the merchandise.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.