C.F.R. » Title 19 » CHAPTER I—U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY › PART 111—CUSTOMS BROKERS › Subpart C—Duties and Responsibilities of Customs Brokers

19 C.F.R. § 111.32

False information

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

A broker must not file or procure or assist in the filing of any claim, or of any document, affidavit, or other papers, known by such broker to be false. In addition, a broker must not give, or solicit or procure the giving of, any information or testimony that the broker knew or should have known was false or misleading in any matter pending before the Department of Homeland Security or to any representative of the Department of Homeland Security. A broker also must document and report to CBP when the broker separates from or cancels representation of a client as a result of determining the client is intentionally attempting to use the broker to defraud the U.S. Government or commit any criminal act against the U.S. Government. The report to CBP must include the client name, date of separation or cancellation, and reason for the separation or cancellation.

[CBP Dec. 22-21, 87 FR 63318, Oct. 18, 2022]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1999–2017 · leading case: United States v. Puentes, 2017 CIT 33 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2017).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
United States v. Puentes, 2017 CIT 33 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2017). · cites it 15× “¶ 31 (Count II, re: 19 C.F.R. § 111.32 ). Timeliness of CF 7501s.”
Delgado v. United States, 491 F. Supp. 2d 1252 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2007). · cites it 2× “Compare 19 C.F.R. §§ 111.32 , .53-81 (2000) with 19 C.”
Delgado v. United States, 536 F. Supp. 2d 1328 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2007). · cites it 3× “Delgado is alleged to have violated is 19 C.F.R. § 111.32 , which states § 111.32 False information.”
Boynton v. United States, 517 F. Supp. 2d 1349 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2007). “19 C.F.R. § 111.32 states, in relevant part, “[a] broker must not file or procure or assist in the filing of any claim, or of any document, affidavit, or other papers, known by such broker to be false.”
Shiepe v. United States, 36 F. Supp. 2d 402 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1999). “28 (a), requiring every licensed officer of a licensed corporate broker to exercise responsible supervision and control over the transaction of the corporation’s customs business, (3) 19 C.F.R. § 111.32 , prohibiting a broker from filing, procuring or assisting in the filing of…”
United States v. Santos, 2013 CIT 154 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2013). · cites it 2× “19 C.F.R. § 111.32 Brokers violate 19 C.F.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.