C.F.R. » Title 19 » CHAPTER I—U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY › PART 111—CUSTOMS BROKERS › Subpart D—Cancellation, Suspension, or Revocation of License or Permit, and Monetary Penalty in Lieu of Suspension or Revocation

19 C.F.R. § 111.61

Decision on preliminary proceedings

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The processing Center will prepare a summary of any oral presentations made by the broker or the broker's attorney and forward it to the appropriate Executive Director, Office of Trade, together with a copy of each paper filed by the broker. The processing Center will also give to the appropriate Executive Director, Office of Trade, a recommendation on action to be taken as a result of the preliminary proceedings. If the appropriate Executive Director, Office of Trade, determines that the broker has satisfactorily responded to the proposed charges and that further proceedings are not warranted, he or she will so inform the processing Center, who will notify the broker. If no response is filed by the broker or if the appropriate Executive Director, Office of Trade, determines that the broker has not satisfactorily responded to all of the proposed charges, he or she will advise the processing Center of that fact and instruct the processing Center to prepare, sign, and serve a notice of charges and the statement of charges. If one or more of the charges in the proposed statement of charges was satisfactorily answered by the broker in the preliminary proceedings, the appropriate Executive Director, Office of Trade, will instruct the processing Center to omit those charges from the statement of charges.

[CBP Dec. 22-21, 87 FR 63319, Oct. 18, 2022]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1973–1998 · leading case: Twigger v. Schultz, 484 F.2d 856 (3rd Cir. 1973).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Twigger v. Schultz, 484 F.2d 856 (3rd Cir. 1973). “19 C.F.R. § 111.61 . If the Commissioner directs him to proceed, the District Director serves the notice of hearing, 19 C.”
John v. Urbano v. United States, 146 F.3d 1346 (Fed. Cir. 1998). “See 19 C.F.R. § 111.61 (1993). That provision in the regulations comports with the first portion of the third sentence of section 1641(d)(2)(B).”
Kazangian v. Brady, 15 Ct. Int'l Trade 488 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1991). “22,24,25; see 19 C.F.R. § 111.61 . Ahear-ing before an administrative law judge (“ALJ”) was conducted on March 16 and March 17,1989.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.