19 C.F.R. § 113.26

Effective dates of bonds and riders

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) General. A continuous bond, and any associated application required by § 113.11, or rider, may be filed up to 60 days prior to the effective date requested for the continuous bond or rider.

(b) Single transaction bond. A single transaction bond is effective on the date of the transaction identified on CBP Form 301.

(c) Continuous bond. A continuous bond is effective on the effective date identified on CBP Form 301.

(d) Riders for name change of principal, address change, and addition of trade names and unincorporated divisions of a corporate principal. Riders for a name change of principal, address change, and addition of trade names and unincorporated divisions of a corporate principal are effective on the effective date identified on the rider.

(e) Rider to delete trade names and unincorporated divisions of a corporate principal. A rider to delete trade names and unincorporated divisions of a corporate principal is effective on the effective date identified on the rider if the date is at least 10 business days after the date the port receives the rider. If the rider is not received 10 business days before the identified effective date or no effective date is identified on the rider, it will be effective on the close of business of the tenth business day after it is received in the port.

[T.D. 84-213, 49 FR 41171, Oct. 19, 1984, as amended at 80 FR 70164, Nov. 13, 2015; CBP Dec. 15-15, 81 FR 15159, Mar. 22, 2016]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1982–2017 · leading case: In Re Advent Corp., 24 B.R. 612 (1st Cir. BAP 1982).
In Re Advent Corp., 24 B.R. 612 (1st Cir. BAP 1982). “19 C.F.R. § 113.26 (d)(3). Here, Customs received notice of F & D’s termination request on June 28, yet purported to terminate the bond on July 25, well within 60 days.”
Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. United States, 2017 CIT 103 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2017). “See 19 C.F.R. § 113.26 (b) (“A single transaction bond is effective on the date of the transaction identified on the [CF 301].”
Hartford Fire Ins. v. United States, 2012 CIT 107 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2012). “Customs argues in its Reply Brief that formation of the bond contract occurs prior to entry of merchandise because 19 C.F.R. § 113.26 (b) makes the effective date of the bond the date of the transaction, as listed on Customs Form 301.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.