C.F.R. » Title 19 » CHAPTER I—U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY › PART 12—SPECIAL CLASSES OF MERCHANDISE

19 C.F.R. § 12.60

Importation prohibited

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The transportation, importation, sale, or possession of the skins of fur seals or sea otters is prohibited if such skins were taken contrary to the provisions of section 2 of the act of February 26, 1944 (58 Stat. 100-104) or, the case of such skins taken under the authority of the act or any fur-seal agreement, if the skins are not officially marked and certified as required by section 2 of the act. Section 16 makes the act inapplicable to skins taken for scientific purposes under a special permit.

[28 FR 14710, Dec. 31, 1963, as amended by T.D. 89-1, 53 FR 51253, Dec. 21, 1988]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1988–2023 · leading case: K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc., 485 U.S. 176 (1988).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc., 485 U.S. 176 (1988). · cites it 2× “, 19 CFR § 12.60 (1987) (fur-seal or sea-otter skins).”
Am. Nat'l Fire Ins. v. Mirasco, Inc., 249 F. Supp. 2d 303 (S.D.N.Y. 2003). “§§ 1241-44 (embargo on switchblade knives); and 19 C.F.R. § 12.60 *324 (1987) (embargo on fur-seal or sea-otter skins)).”
Earth Island Inst. v. Christopher, 6 F.3d 648 (9th Cir. 1993). “19 C.F.R. § 12.60 (1987). 3 *652 The similarity between that ban on sea otters, and the ban on shrimp products in this case, undermines appellants’ argument that the subject matter of this lawsuit is beyond the expertise of the CIT.”
Salmon Spawning & Recovery All. v. United States, 626 F. Supp. 2d 1277 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2009). “§§ 1241-1244 ; 19 C.F.R. § 12.60 ); Earth Island Inst. v.”
Earth Island Inst. v. Brown, 28 F.3d 76 (9th Cir. 1994). · cites it 2× “§§ 1241-1244 , and fur-seal or sea-otter skins, 19 C.F.R. § 12.60 (1987). 485 U.S. at 184 , 108 S.”
S. Cross Seafoods, LLC v. United States, 2023 CIT 171 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2023). · cites it 7× “§ 2435 (3), and the language of 19 C.F.R. § 12.60 (1987) — which the Supreme Court noted in K Mart to be an example of an “embargo[] .”
Earth Island Inst. v. Brown, 17 F.3d 1241 (9th Cir. 1994). · cites it 2× “§§ 1241-1244 , and fur-seal or sea-otter skins, 19 C.F.R. § 12.60 (1987). 485 U.S. at 184 , 108 S.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.