19 C.F.R. § 148.11

Declaration required

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

All articles brought into the United States by any individual must be declared to a CBP officer at the port of first arrival in the United States, on a conveyance en route to the United States on which a CBP officer is assigned for that purpose, or at a preclearance office in a foreign country where a United States CBP officer is stationed for that purpose.

[T.D. 73-27, 38 FR 2449, Jan. 26, 1973, as amended by CBP Dec. 09-37, 74 FR 48854, Sept. 25, 2009]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 6 cases, 1978–1994 · leading case: United States v. Richard M. Mitchell, 39 F.3d 465 (4th Cir. 1994).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

United States v. Richard M. Mitchell, 39 F.3d 465 (4th Cir. 1994). · cites it 2× “*467 (1) declare the items to a Customs officer as required by 19 C.F.R. § 148.11 (1987) (“the Customs regulation”); (2) file a completed FWS Form 3-177 as required by 50 C.”

United States v. Philip R. Masters, 612 F.2d 1117 (9th Cir. 1980). “For instance, 19 C.F.R. § 148.11 (1979) provides: All articles brought into the United States by any individual shall be declared to a Customs officer at the port of first arrival in the United States, on a conveyance en route to the United States on which a Customs officer is…”

United States v. 66 Pieces of Jade & Gold Jewelry, 760 F.2d 970 (9th Cir. 1985). · cites it 2× “Section 1497 and 19 C.F.R. § 148.11 (1984) require a declaration by the traveler before examination of baggage has begun, and 19 C.”

United States v. Helen Jenkins, 586 F.2d 635 (6th Cir. 1978). “While 19 C.F.R. § 148.11 does contain broad language, 19 C.”

United States v. Aundra O. Magee, 586 F.2d 636 (6th Cir. 1978). “§ 545 and two regulations, 19 C.F.R. § 148.11 and 19 C.F.R. § 123.3 , indicates no such lack of specificity or overbreadth.”

United States v. 164 Pieces of Jewelry, 785 F. Supp. 885 (D. Or. 1991). “19 C.F.R. §§ 148.11 , 148.13. Any article which is not included in the declaration and is not mentioned before examination of the baggage begins is subject to forfeiture under 19 U.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.