C.F.R. » Title 19 » CHAPTER I—U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY › PART 152—CLASSIFICATION AND APPRAISEMENT OF MERCHANDISE › Subpart B—Classification

19 C.F.R. § 152.11

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Merchandise shall be classified in accordance with the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (19 U.S.C. 1202) as interpreted by administrative and judicial rulings.

[T.D. 73-175, 38 FR 17477, July 2, 1973, as amended by T.D. 89-1, 53 FR 51269, Dec. 21, 1988]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1994–2015 · leading case: United States v. Santos, 2012 CIT 157 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2012).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
United States v. Santos, 2012 CIT 157 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2012). · cites it 4× “Count III Count III alleges that Santos violated 19 C.F.R. §§ 152.11 and 141.90 by misclassifying merchandise.”
Sandvik Steel Co. v. United States, Fujitsu Ten Corp. of Am. v. United States, 164 F.3d 596 (Fed. Cir. 1998). “§ 1202 (1994); 19 C.F.R. § 152.11 . The importer may within 90 days of liquidation file a protest with Customs challenging the classification of its merchandise.”
United States v. Horizon Prods. Int'l, Inc., 2015 CIT 80 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2015). “in preparing or assisting in the preparation and filing of records relating to any customs business matter”); see also 19 C.F.R. § 152.11 (“Merchandise shall be classified in accordance with the [HTSUS].”
Inner Secrets/Secretly Yours, Inc. v. United States, 869 F. Supp. 959 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1994). “19 C.F.R. § 152.11 (1994). 3 . 19 C.F.R. § 177.”
United States v. Santos, 2013 CIT 154 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2013). · cites it 3× “19 C.F.R. § 152.11 19 C.F.R. § 152.11 requires classification of merchandise in accordance with the HTSUS.”
Frontier Ins. v. United States, 276 F. Supp. 2d 1334 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2003). “§ 1202 ; 19 C.F.R. § 152.11 . If the importer disagrees with that determination, it may file a protest within 90 days.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.