19 C.F.R. § 162.63
Arrests and seizures
Arrests and seizures under the Controlled Substances Act (84 Stat. 1242, 21 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), and the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (84 Stat. 1285, 21 U.S.C. 951 et seq.), will be handled in the same manner as other Customs arrests and seizures. However, Schedule I and Schedule II controlled substances (as defined in 21 U.S.C. 802(6) and 812) imported contrary to law will be seized and forfeited in the manner provided in the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 881(f)). See § 162.45a.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1976–1981 · leading case: United States v. Louis Darnell Gordon, 638 F.2d 886 (5th Cir. 1981).
United States v. Louis Darnell Gordon, 638 F.2d 886 (5th Cir. 1981). “Contrary to Gordon’s argument, the Government’s failure to comply with a notice provision of a regulation, 19 C.F.R. § 162.63 , 3 did not deprive it of title to the marijuana.”
United States v. Lazaro Caraballo, Santiago Gonzalez, & Juan De La Caridad Ramirez, 571 F.2d 975 (5th Cir. 1978). “19 C.F.R. 162.63 states that under the Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.”
United States v. Stanley, 545 F.2d 661 (9th Cir. 1976). “19 C.F.R. 162.63 declares that searches under the Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.”
United States v. Frank D. Stanley & Mario Gonzalez-Garcia, United States of Am. v. The O/s Nat'l, Her Engines, Tackle, Appurtenances, Etc., in Rem, Frank D. Stanley, Claimant-Appellee, 545 F.2d 661 (9th Cir. 1976). “19 C.F.R. 162.63 declares that searches under the Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.