19 C.F.R. § 165.2

Entries subject to this part

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Entries that may be the subject of an allegation made under § 165.11 or a request for an investigation under § 165.14 are those entries of allegedly covered merchandise made within one year before the receipt of an allegation under § 165.11 or of a request for an investigation under § 165.14. In addition, at its discretion, CBP may investigate other entries of such covered merchandise.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2020–2025 · leading case: Royal Brush Mfg., Inc. v. United States, 2020 CIT 171 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2020).
Royal Brush Mfg., Inc. v. United States, 2020 CIT 171 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2020). “7Pursuant to 19 C.F.R. § 165.2 , subject entries “are those entries of allegedly covered merchandise made within one year before the receipt of an allegation,” but, “at its discretion, CBP may investigate other entries of such covered merchandise.”
Royal Brush Mfg., Inc. v. United States, 2023 CIT 177 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2023). “4 Pursuant to 19 C.F.R. § 165.2 , subject entries “are those entries of allegedly covered merchandise made within one year before the receipt of an allegation,” but, “at its discretion, CBP may investigate other entries of such covered merchandise.”
Ikadan Sys. USA, Inc. v. United States, 2023 CIT 88 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2023). “” Initial Determination at 3–4 (citing 19 C.F.R. § 165.2 ). Court No. 21-00592 Page 6 Contrary to Ikadan’s assertions that “no tribar floors were imported during the POI,” TRLED found that several entries made by Ikadan contained steel tribar floors, and that “the image of a…”
Am. Pac. Plywood, Inc. v. United States, 2025 CIT 87 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2025). “Appx01020–01021 (citing 19 C.F.R. § 165.2 ). The investi- gation ended on June 29, 2020, the date of the agency’s eva- sion determination.”
Blue Pipe Steel Ctr. Co. v. United States, 2025 CIT 126 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2025). “” Notice of Initiation of Investigation at APPX9873 (citing 19 C.F.R. § 165.2 ). On June 30, 2020, Commerce issued a final scope ruling in which it determined that dual-stenciled pipe is within the scope of the Order.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.