C.F.R. » Title 19 » CHAPTER I—U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY › PART 165—INVESTIGATION OF CLAIMS OF EVASION OF ANTIDUMPING AND COUNTERVAILING DUTIES › Subpart C—Investigation Procedures

19 C.F.R. § 165.21

Administrative record

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Administrative record. CBP will maintain a record for purposes of making a determination as to evasion under § 165.27 and conducting an administrative review under § 165.46. The administrative record will contain all of the following, if applicable, but is not limited to:

(1) Materials obtained and considered by CBP during the course of an investigation under this part;

(2) Factual information submitted pursuant to § 165.23;

(3) Information obtained during and the results of any verification conducted pursuant to § 165.25;

(4) Materials from other agencies provided to CBP pursuant to the investigation;

(5) Written arguments submitted pursuant to § 165.26 and subpart D of this part; and

(6) Summaries of oral discussions with interested parties relevant to the investigation pursuant to § 165.23.

(b) Maintenance of the record. CBP will maintain the administrative record of each investigation or review conducted by CBP pursuant to this part. All information properly filed with CBP pursuant to §§ 165.4 and 165.5 will be placed on the administrative record. CBP will not consider in its determinations or include on the administrative record any information that is not properly filed with CBP.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2023–2025 · leading case: Skyview Cabinet USA, Inc. v. United States, 2023 CIT 91 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2023).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Skyview Cabinet USA, Inc. v. United States, 2023 CIT 91 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2023). “19 C.F.R. §§ 165.21 , 165.23. It is from this record — built largely by the parties themselves — that Customs makes its determination regarding whether evasion has occurred.”
Am. Pac. Plywood, Inc. v. United States, 2025 CIT 87 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2025). “” Appx45315 (quoting 19 C.F.R. § 165.21 (a)(1)). InterGlobal now complains that it was denied such access and hypothesizes a laundry list of secret mate- rials bearing on Customs’s decision.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.