C.F.R. » Title 19 » CHAPTER I—U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY › PART 171—FINES, PENALTIES, AND FORFEITURES

19 C.F.R. § 171.0

Scope

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

This part contains provisions relating to petitions for relief from fines, forfeitures, and certain penalties incurred, and petitions for the restoration of proceeds from sale of seized and forfeited property. This part does not relate to petitions on claims for liquidated damages or penalties which are guaranteed by the conditions of the International Carrier Bond (see § 113.64 of this Chapter).

[T.D. 00-57, 65 FR 53576, Sept. 5, 2000]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1978–2006 · leading case: Stuhlbarg Int'l Sales Co., Inc., a California Corp., D/B/A Sisco v. John D. Brush & Co., Inc., a New York Corp., 240 F.3d 832 (9th Cir. 2001).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Stuhlbarg Int'l Sales Co., Inc., a California Corp., D/B/A Sisco v. John D. Brush & Co., Inc., a New York Corp., 240 F.3d 832 (9th Cir. 2001). “Only after a notice has been issued can an importer petition for relief under 19 C.F.R. § 171.0 , or claim the seized items by giving a bond under 19 U.”
United States v. Maximiliano Sanchez-Escareno, Adolpho Ayala Sanchez & David Garcia Lopez, 950 F.2d 193 (5th Cir. 1991). · cites it 2× “Further, 19 C.F.R. § 171.0 et seq., (1991), provides the administratively promulgated rules for filing petitions for relief of fines, penalties, or forfeitures incurred under any law administered by United States Customs officials.”
H & H Wholesale Servs., Inc. v. United States, 437 F. Supp. 2d 1335 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2006). “Compare 19 C.F.R. §§ 171.0 (providing that part 171 applies to petitions for the restoration of proceeds from the sale of seized and forfeited property), 171.”
Ivers v. United States, 581 F.2d 1362 (9th Cir. 1978). “) See also 19 C.F.R. § 171.0 (“Scope”): This part contains provisions relating to filing of petitions and actions upon petitions for relief from fines, penalties, and forfeitures incurred, and petitions for the restoration of proceeds from sale of seized and forfeited property.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.