19 C.F.R. § 174.16

Limitation on protests after reliquidation

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

A protest shall not be filed against the reliquidation decision of the port director or Center director made before January 19, 2017, or the reliquidation decision of the Center director made on or after January 19, 2017, upon any question not involved in the reliquidation.

[CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93025, Dec. 20, 2016]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1984–2002 · leading case: Audiovox Corp. v. United States, 598 F. Supp. 387 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1984).
Audiovox Corp. v. United States, 598 F. Supp. 387 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1984). · cites it 2× “§ 1514 (d) 2 and 19 C.F.R. § 174.16 3 prohibit the protest of a question outside the scope of a reliquidation and § 1514(c)(1) 4 prohibits the filing of more than one protest for each category of merchandise.”
AutoAlliance Int'l, Inc. v. United States, 240 F. Supp. 2d 1315 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2002). “at 7) (citing 19 C.F.R. § 174.16 . (2000).) According to Defendant, the reliquidation only involved the approved aspects of the Initial Protests and left untouched the denied aspects of the Initial Protests.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.