C.F.R. » Title 19 » CHAPTER II—UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION › SUBCHAPTER B—NONADJUDICATIVE INVESTIGATIONS › PART 207—INVESTIGATIONS OF WHETHER INJURY TO DOMESTIC INDUSTRIES RESULTS FROM IMPORTS SOLD AT LESS THAN FAIR VALUE OR FROM SUBSIDIZED EXPORTS TO THE UNITED STATES › Subpart C—Final Determinations, Short Life Cycle Products

19 C.F.R. § 207.22

Prehearing and final staff reports

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Prehearing staff report. The Director shall prepare and place in the record, prior to the hearing, a prehearing staff report containing information concerning the subject matter of the investigation. A version of the staff report containing business proprietary information shall be placed in the nonpublic record and made available to persons authorized to receive business proprietary information under § 207.7, and a nonbusiness proprietary version of the staff report shall be placed in the public record.

(b) Final staff report. After the hearing, the Director shall revise the prehearing staff report and submit to the Commission, prior to the Commission's final determination, a final version of the staff report. The final staff report is intended to supplement and correct the information contained in the prehearing staff report. A public version of the final staff report shall be made available to the public and a business proprietary version shall also be made available to persons authorized to receive business proprietary information under section 207.7.

[56 FR 11927, Mar. 21, 1991, as amended at 60 FR 22, Jan. 3, 1995. Redesignated at 61 FR 37832, July 22, 1996]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2000–2002 · leading case: Allegheny Ludlum Corp. v. United States, 116 F. Supp. 2d 1276 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2000).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Allegheny Ludlum Corp. v. United States, 116 F. Supp. 2d 1276 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2000). · cites it 3× “Did, however, the ITC’s reliance on this document deprive Plaintiffs of due process? In their Reply, Plaintiffs argue that the last minute creation of Alternative Table C-3 ignored 19 C.F.R. § 207.22 (1999), which required the ITC to provide the parties with copies of its…”
Elkem Metals Co. v. United States, 193 F. Supp. 2d 1314 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2002). “”); 19 C.F.R. § 207.22 (“Each party may submit to the Commission, no later than a date specified in the notice of investigation, a prehearing brief.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.