C.F.R. » Title 20 » CHAPTER III—SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION › PART 416—SUPPLEMENTAL SECURITY INCOME FOR THE AGED, BLIND, AND DISABLED › Subpart S—Interim Assistance Provisions

20 C.F.R. § 416.1920

Your appeal rights in the State

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Under its interim assistance agreement with us, the State must agree to give you an opportunity for a hearing if you disagree with the State's actions regarding repayment of interim assistance. For example, you are entitled to a hearing by the State if you disagree with the State regarding the amount of the repayment the State keeps or the amount of any excess the State pays to you. You are not entitled to a Federal hearing on the State's actions regarding repayment of interim assistance.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1992–2025 · leading case: Williams v. King, 796 F. Supp. 737 (E.D.N.Y 1992).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Williams v. King, 796 F. Supp. 737 (E.D.N.Y 1992). “” 20 C.F.R. § 416.1920 . That is, the applicant is entitled to a hearing before the appropriate state agency in order to contest the amount of the recoupment.”
Labrecque v SSA, 2015 DNH 098 (D.N.H. 2015). “2 See 20 C.F.R. § 416.1920 (c). At the third step, the ALJ concluded that Labrecque’s impairments, either individually or collectively, did not meet or “medically equal” one of the listed impairments in the Social Security regulations.”
Lewis v. Soc. Sec. Admin. (S.D.N.Y. 2020). “20 C.F.R. § 416.1920 . The regulations explicitly provide: “You are not entitled to a Federal hearing on the State’s actions regarding repayment of interim assistance.”
Rispo v. O'malley (E.D. Pa. 2025). “2000); see also 20 C.F.R. § 416.1920 (a)(4). The disability claimant bears the burden of establishing steps one through four.”
Kathleen Chambers v. Carolyn Colvin, Acting Comm'r, Soc. Sec. Admin., 2016 DNH 028 (D.N.H. 2016). “See 20 C.F.R. § 416.1920 (c). At the third step, the ALJ concluded that Chambers’s impairments – either individually or collectively – did not meet or “medically equal” one of the listed impairments in the Social Security regulations.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.