20 C.F.R. § 655.850
Who has custody of the administrative record?
The official record of every completed administrative hearing procedure provided by subparts H and I of this part shall be maintained and filed under the custody and control of the Chief Administrative Law Judge. Upon receipt of a complaint seeking review of the final agency action in a United States District Court, the Chief Administrative Law Judge shall certify the official record and shall transmit such record to the clerk of the court.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2000–2025 · leading case: United States v. Bedi, 318 F. Supp. 3d 561 (N.D.N.Y. 2018).
United States v. Bedi, 318 F. Supp. 3d 561 (N.D.N.Y. 2018). “20 C.F.R. § 655.850 (characterizing ARB's decision as "final agency action"); see also Venkatraman v.”
Panwar v. Access Therapies, Inc., 975 F. Supp. 2d 948 (S.D. Ind. 2013). “20 C.F.R. § 655.850 . Courts have held that there is no private right of action, absent exhaustion of administrative remedies, for parties who believe their employer violated *956 the terms of an H-1B visa agreement in violation of the INA, and such claims are appropriately…”
Shah v. Wilco Sys., Inc., 126 F. Supp. 2d 641 (S.D.N.Y. 2000). “20 C.F.R. § 655.850 . Section 1182(n)(5), which may also be implicated by plaintiffs’ allegations in this case, contains a different procedure.”
Ndiaye v. Cvs Pharmacy 6081, 547 F. Supp. 2d 807 (S.D. Ohio 2008). “20 C.F.R. §§ 655.815 , 655.820, 655.840.”
Boudjelta (S.D.N.Y. 2025). “20 C.F.R. § 655.850 . Here, as Boudjelta acknowledges in the amended complaint, she has begun proceedings before the Department of Labor, which are ongoing.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.