20 C.F.R. § 702.314

Informal conferences; how conducted; where held

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) No stenographic report shall be taken at informal conferences and no witnesses shall be called. The district director shall guide the discussion toward the achievement of the purpose of such conference, recommending courses of action where there are disputed issues, and giving the parties the benefit of his experience and specialized knowledge in the field of workmen's compensation.

(b) Conferences generally shall be held at the district director's office. However, such conferences may be held at any place which, in the opinion of the district director, will be of greater convenience to the parties or to their representatives.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1982–2007 · leading case: Washington Metro. Area Transit Auth. v. Reid, 666 A.2d 41 (D.C. 1995).
Washington Metro. Area Transit Auth. v. Reid, 666 A.2d 41 (D.C. 1995). “, 20 C.F.R. § 702.314 (a) (1995) with 7 DCMR § 219.”
Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. Dir., Off. of Workers' Comp. Programs David Hassell, 477 F.3d 123 (4th Cir. 2007). “20 C.F.R. § 702.314 states that such conferences should generally be held at the District Director’s office; however, they may be held at any place which will be of greater convenience to the parties.”
Potomac Iron Works v. Love, 673 F.2d 537 (D.C. Cir. 1982). “20 C.F.R. § 702.314 (1981). Formal hearings, on the other hand, are conducted by an administrative law judge.”
Newport News Shipbuilding v. DOWCP (4th Cir. 2007). “20 C.F.R. § 702.314 states that such conferences should gener- ally be held at the District Director’s office; however, they may be held at any place which will be of greater convenience to the parties.”
Sykes v. Patrai Shipping Corp., 602 F. Supp. 1041 (E.D. Pa. 1985). “” 20 C.F.R. § 702.314 . The October 5, 1983 conference was an informal conference of the type provided for in these regulations.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.