(a) With the exception of the second sentence of § 718.204(a), this part is applicable to the adjudication of all claims filed on or after June 30, 1982 under Part C of the Act. It provides standards for establishing entitlement to benefits under the Act and describes the criteria for the development of medical evidence used in establishing such entitlement. The second sentence of § 718.204(a) is applicable to the adjudication of all claims filed after January 19, 2001.
(b) Publication of certain provisions or parts of certain provisions that apply only to claims filed prior to June 30, 1982, or to claims subject to Section 435 of the Act, has been discontinued because those provisions affect an increasingly smaller number of claims. The version of Part 718 set forth in 20 CFR, parts 500 to end, edition revised as of April 1, 2010, applies to the adjudication of all claims filed prior to June 30, 1982, as appropriate.
(c) The provisions of this part must, to the extent appropriate, be construed together in the adjudication of claims.
[78 FR 59114, Sept. 25, 2013]
Notes of Decisions
Pittston Coal Grp. v. Sebben, 488 U.S. 105 (1988).
· cites it 2× “See 20 CFR § 718.2 (1988). II One of the three consolidated cases before us, Director, OWCP v.”
Jesse Adams v. Dir., Owcp, 886 F.2d 818 (6th Cir. 1989).
· cites it 2× “1989); 20 C.F.R. § 718.2 . Under Part 718, the miner must prove three facts in order to receive Black Lung Benefits: (1) that he suffers from pneumoconiosis; (2) that his pneumoconiosis arose at least in part out of his coal mine employment; and (3) that he is totally disabled…”
Kentland Elkhorn Coal Corp. v. Noah Hall Dir., 287 F.3d 555 (6th Cir. 2002).
· cites it 2× “The current version of 20 C.F.R. § 718.2 explains the applicability of part 718 of the Code of Federal Regulations to pending cases.”
Piney Mountain Coal Co. v. Mays, 176 F.3d 753 (4th Cir. 1999).
“See 20 C.F.R. § 718.2 . . The condition giving rise to this irrebuttable presumption is commonly referred to as "complicated” pneumoconiosis, though that term does not appear in § 718.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.