C.F.R.
»
Title 20
» CHAPTER VI—OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR › SUBCHAPTER B—FEDERAL COAL MINE HEALTH AND SAFETY ACT OF 1969, AS AMENDED › PART 725—CLAIMS FOR BENEFITS UNDER PART C OF TITLE IV OF THE FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT, AS AMENDED › Subpart B—Persons Entitled to Benefits, Conditions, and Duration of Entitlement
(a) An individual who is the surviving spouse or surviving divorced spouse of a miner is eligible for benefits if such individual:
(1) Is not married;
(2) Was dependent on the miner at the pertinent time; and
(3) The deceased miner either:
(i) Is determined to have died due to pneumoconiosis; or
(ii) Filed a claim for benefits on or after January 1, 1982, which results or resulted in a final award of benefits, and the surviving spouse or surviving divorced spouse filed a claim for benefits after January 1, 2005 which was pending on or after March 23, 2010.
(b) If more than one spouse meets the conditions of entitlement prescribed in paragraph (a), then each spouse will be considered a beneficiary for purposes of section 412(a)(2) of the Act without regard to the existence of any other entitled spouse or spouses.
[65 FR 80054, Dec. 20, 2000, as amended at 78 FR 59117, Sept. 25, 2013]
Notes of Decisions
U.S. Steel Mining Co., LLC v. Cassandra M. Terry, 920 F.3d 1283 (11th Cir. 2019).
· cites it 3× “212 , which implements § 932( l ), an otherwise eligible survivor must show (as relevant here) that the deceased miner either: (i) Is determined to have died due to pneumoconiosis; or (ii) Filed a claim for benefits on or after January 1, 1982, which results or resulted in a…”
Union Carbide Corp. v. Virginia Richards, 721 F.3d 307 (4th Cir. 2013).
“20 C.F.R. § 725.212 , 725.218, 725.222. DOL has issued a notice of proposed rulemaking, in which it proposes to revise its regulations to reflect the ACA amendments.”
Nat'l Mining Ass'n v. Chao, 160 F. Supp. 2d 47 (D.D.C. 2001).
· cites it 2× “20 C.F.R. § 725.212 (b): This rule describes the conditions under which a surviving or divorced spouse may be eligible for benefits and that concurrent recovery by more than one qualified spouse is no longer precluded under this section.”
Nat'l Mining Ass'n v. Dep't of Labor, 292 F.3d 849 (D.C. Cir. 2002).
“Similarly, under the new 20 C.F.R. § 725.212 (b) and § 725.214(d), a miner could have more than one surviving spouse if he divorced and remarried during the pertinent period.”
Pothering v. Parkson Coal Co., 861 F.2d 1321 (3rd Cir. 1988).
· cites it 2× “The notice 2 recited the text of § 422(Z) and stated the following: Based upon the available evidence, I find that the miner’s survivor(s) satisfy the conditions set forth in 20 CFR 725.212 et seq.[ 3 ] It has been initially determined .”
— 20 C.F.R. § 725.212(b) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.