C.F.R. » Title 21 » CHAPTER I—FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES › SUBCHAPTER B—FOOD FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION › PART 182—SUBSTANCES GENERALLY RECOGNIZED AS SAFE › Subpart A—General Provisions

21 C.F.R. § 182.60

Synthetic flavoring substances and adjuvants

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Synthetic flavoring substances and adjuvants that are generally recognized as safe for their intended use, within the meaning of section 409 of the Act, are as follows:

Acetaldehyde (ethanal). Acetoin (acetyl methylcarbinol). Anethole (parapropenyl anisole). Benzaldehyde (benzoic aldehyde). N-Butyric acid (butanoic acid). d- or l-Carvone (carvol). Cinnamaldehyde (cinnamic aldehyde). Citral (2,6-dimethyloctadien-2,6-al-8, gera-nial, neral). Decanal (N-decylaldehyde, capraldehyde, capric aldehyde, caprinaldehyde, aldehyde C-10). Ethyl acetate. Ethyl butyrate. 3-Methyl-3-phenyl glycidic acid ethyl ester (ethyl-methyl-phenyl-glycidate, so-called strawberry aldehyde, C-16 aldehyde). Ethyl vanillin. Geraniol (3,7-dimethyl-2,6 and 3,6-octadien-1-ol). Geranyl acetate (geraniol acetate). Limonene (d-, l-, and dl-). Linalool (linalol, 3,7-dimethyl-1,6-octadien-3-ol). Linalyl acetate (bergamol). Methyl anthranilate (methyl-2-aminobenzoate). Piperonal (3,4-methylenedioxy-benzaldehyde, heliotropin). Vanillin.[42 FR 14640, Mar. 15, 1977, as amended at 43 FR 47724, Oct. 17, 1978; 44 FR 3963, Jan. 19, 1979; 44 FR 20656, Apr. 6, 1979; 48 FR 51907, Nov. 15, 1983; 54 FR 7402, Feb. 21, 1989]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2019–2019 · leading case: Rice v. Nat'l Beverage Corp. d/b/a LaCroix Sparkling Waters (N.D. Ill. 2019).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Rice v. Nat'l Beverage Corp. d/b/a LaCroix Sparkling Waters (N.D. Ill. 2019). · cites it 3× ““Natural” And “Synthetic” Substances There are numerous arrows in defendant’s quiver, but perhaps the most important one is its claim, argued first and repeatedly, that plaintiff bases its suit on “an incorrect, nonsensical interpretation” of an FDA regulation, 21 CFR §182.60 ,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.