22 C.F.R. § 127.3
Penalties for violations
Any person who willfully:
(a) Violates any provision of § 38 or § 39 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778 and 2779) or any rule or regulation issued under either § 38 or § 39 of the Act, or any undertaking specifically required by part 124 of this subchapter; or
(b) In a registration, license application, or report required by § 38 or § 39 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778 and 2779) or by any rule or regulation issued under either section, makes any untrue statement of a material fact or omits a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein not misleading, shall upon conviction be subject to a fine or imprisonment, or both, as prescribed by 22 U.S.C. 2778(c).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2006–2024 · leading case: United States v. Jorge Eduardo Castro-Trevino, 464 F.3d 536 (5th Cir. 2006).
United States v. Jorge Eduardo Castro-Trevino, 464 F.3d 536 (5th Cir. 2006). “22 C.F.R. § 127.3 provides, in pertinent part: "Any person who willfully .”
Grant Cochran v. Air & Liquid Sys. Corp. (C.D. Cal. 2023). “See 22 C.F.R. 127.3, 22 U.S.C. 27 § 2278(c), (e).”
Arthur Rosengren v. Curtiss-Wright Corp. (C.D. Cal. 2020). “See 22 C.F.R. 127.3, 22 U.S.C. § 2278 (c), (e).”
Raytheon Co. v. Ahtna Support & Training Servs., LLC (W.D. Ky. 2024). “§ 2778 (c) (ITAR); 22 C.F.R. 127.3(b) (ITAR); 50 U.S.C. § 4819 (b) (EAR); 15 C.”
United States v. Castro-Trevino (5th Cir. 2006). “Castro-Trevino filed an unopposed motion for a downward departure 5 22 C.F.R. § 127.3 provides, in pertinent part: “Any person who willfully .”
United States v. Pulungan, 561 F. Supp. 2d 1013 (W.D. Wis. 2008). “§ 2778 (c) and 22 C.F.R. § 127.3 (a), a person who willfully violates this statutory scheme commits a felony punishable by up to ten years in prison.”
— 22 C.F.R. § 127.3(b) — 1 case
Raytheon Co. v. Ahtna Support & Training Servs., LLC (W.D. Ky. 2024). “§ 2778 (c) (ITAR); 22 C.F.R. 127.3(b) (ITAR); 50 U.S.C. § 4819 (b) (EAR); 15 C.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.