22 C.F.R. § 51.9
Amendment of passports
Except for the convenience of the U.S. Government, no passport may be amended.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1967–2004 · leading case: United States v. Michael & Janet Falley, 489 F.2d 33 (2d Cir. 1973).
United States v. Michael & Janet Falley, 489 F.2d 33 (2d Cir. 1973). “4 22 C.F.R. 51.9 reads as follows: A passport shall at all times remain the property of the United States and shall be returned to the Government upon demand.”
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum, Etc., 544 F. Supp. 721 (S.D. Fla. 1982). “1967); 22 C.F.R. § 51.9 . 4 The passport itself does not contain testimonial evidence.”
United States v. Leon Weiss, 491 F.2d 460 (2d Cir. 1974). “2d 526 (1967), it bears the seal of the Department of State, it remains the property of the United States, it is returnable on demand, 22 C.F.R. § 51.9 (1973 ed.), and it may be altered or stamped only by authorized domestic or foreign officials.”
Atem v. Ashcroft, 312 F. Supp. 2d 792 (E.D. Va. 2004). “See 22 C.F.R. § 51.9 (stating that United States passports shall at all times remain the property of the United States and shall be returned to the Government upon demand).”
Staughton Lynd v. Dean Rusk, Sec'y of State, Jane Wittman v. Sec'y of State, 389 F.2d 940 (D.C. Cir. 1967). “Hackworth, Digest of International Law 437-439 (1942), 22 C.F.R. § 51.9 (1967).”
In Re Candiotti, 729 F. Supp. 840 (S.D. Fla. 1990). “Pursuant to 22 C.F.R. § 51.9 , “A passport shall at all times remain the property of the United States and shall be returned to the Government upon demand.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.