C.F.R. » Title 22 » CHAPTER I—DEPARTMENT OF STATE › SUBCHAPTER F—NATIONALITY AND PASSPORTS › PART 53—PASSPORT REQUIREMENT AND EXCEPTIONS

22 C.F.R. § 53.3

Attempt of a citizen to enter without a valid passport

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The appropriate officer at the port of entry shall report to the Department of State any citizen of the United States who attempts to enter the United States contrary to the provisions of this part, so that the Department of State may apply the waiver provisions of § 53.2(h) and § 53.2(i) to such citizen, if appropriate.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1964–1967 · leading case: Zemel v. Rusk, 381 U.S. 1 (1965).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Zemel v. Rusk, 381 U.S. 1 (1965). · cites it 2× “22 CFR § 53.3 (b), and from its issuance of a public notice declaring all outstanding passports invalid for travel to Cuba unless specifically endorsed for such travel under the authority of the Secretary of State, 26 Fed.”
United States v. Laub, 385 U.S. 475 (1967). · cites it 2× “” 22 CFR § 53.3 (b) (1958 rev.). On January 3, 1961, the United States broke diplomatic relations with Cuba.”
Zemel v. Rusk, 228 F. Supp. 65 (D. Conn. 1964). · cites it 2× “" On January 16, 1961 the Secretary of State, pursuant to the authority contained in Presidential Proclamation 3004, amended 22 C.F.R. § 53.3 (b) (1958) by Department Regulation 108.”
MacEwan v. Rusk, 228 F. Supp. 306 (E.D. Pa. 1964). “482, 22 C.F.R. § 53.3 (b). 13 . 26 Fed.Reg. 492.”
United States v. Laub, 253 F. Supp. 433 (E.D.N.Y 1966). · cites it 4× “” On the other hand, the Secretary’s amendment to 22 CFR § 53.3 (b), supra, requiring a passport for travel between the United States and Cuba, is published under said Part 53.”
United States v. Travis, 241 F. Supp. 472 (S.D. Cal. 1964). · cites it 2× “3, which excludes Cuba from the list of countries to which a citizen may travel without a passport specifically endorsed for such travel, then the court concludes defendant is guilty of the offenses charged. Defendant argues there is no legal basis for the restriction on travel…”
Helen Maxine Levi Travis v. United States, 353 F.2d 506 (9th Cir. 1966). “(22 CFR 53.3). Area restrictions have long been used and are recognized as valid.”
— 22 C.F.R. § 53.3(b) — 1 case
United States v. Laub, 253 F. Supp. 433 (E.D.N.Y 1966). “” On the other hand, the Secretary’s amendment to 22 CFR § 53.3 (b), supra, requiring a passport for travel between the United States and Cuba, is published under said Part 53.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.