C.F.R. » Title 23 » CHAPTER I—FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION › SUBCHAPTER G—ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC OPERATIONS › PART 646—RAILROADS › Subpart B—Railroad-Highway Projects

23 C.F.R. § 646.208

Funding

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Railroad/highway crossing projects may be funded through the Federal-aid funding source appropriate for the involved project.

(b) Projects for the elimination of hazards at railroad/highway crossings may, at the option of the State, be funded with the funds provided by 23 U.S.C. 133(d)(1).

[62 FR 45328, Aug. 27, 1997]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1995–2006 · leading case: Hargrove v. Missouri Pac. R. Co., 925 So. 2d 25 (La. Ct. App. 2006).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Hargrove v. Missouri Pac. R. Co., 925 So. 2d 25 (La. Ct. App. 2006). “Finally, 23 C.F.R. § 646.208 provides, in pertinent part, that: (a) Railroad/highway crossing projects may be funded through the Federal-aid funding source appropriate for the involved project.”
Nye v. CSX Transp., Inc., 300 F. Supp. 2d 529 (N.D. Ohio 2004). “” 23 C.F.R. 646.208. Accordingly, with respect to the preemptive effect of Sections 646.”
Hamilton v. Illinois Cent. R.R., 894 F. Supp. 1014 (S.D. Miss. 1995). “23 C.F.R. § 646.208 . There is generally no requirement that railroad companies share the costs of hazard elimination projects with the State, 23 C.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.