24 C.F.R. § 100.200

Purpose

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The purpose of this subpart is to effectuate sections 6 (a) and (b) and 15 of the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 7 cases, 2001–2019 · leading case: Douglas v. Kriegsfeld Corp., 884 A.2d 1109 (D.C. 2005).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Douglas v. Kriegsfeld Corp., 884 A.2d 1109 (D.C. 2005). · cites it 2× “See 24 C.F.R. §§ 100.200 -.205. 250 F.3d at 1046 (emphasis added).”

Presidential Vill., LLC v. Phillips, 158 A.3d 772 (Conn. 2017). “(2016), the department's regulations concerning accommodations for handicapped persons; see 24 C.F.R. § 100.200 et seq. ; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.”

Kuchmas v. Towson Univ., 553 F. Supp. 2d 556 (D. Maryland 2008). “§ 3604 (f)(3)(C), and 24 C.F.R. § 100.200 , et seq., by failing to “design and construct Millennium Hall so that all covered units contain all required features of accessible design.”

Groner v. Golden Gate Gardens Apts., 250 F.3d 1039 (6th Cir. 2001). “See 24 C.F.R. §§ 100.200 — .205. Taking all of the circumstances into account, the balance of the equities in this ease does not weigh in Groner’s favor.”

United States v. Noble Homes, Inc., 173 F. Supp. 3d 568 (N.D. Ohio 2016). “24 C.F.R. § 100.200 et seq. HUD issued the Guidelines two years later.”

United States v. Shanrie Co., Inc., 669 F. Supp. 2d 932 (S.D. Ill. 2009). “24 C.F.R. § 100.200 . Guidelines setting minimum standards for compliance with the design and construction requirements were issued two years later.”

Phillips v. Acacia on the Green Condo. Ass'n, Inc. (N.D. Ohio 2019). “6 24 C.F.R. § 100.200 et seq. are the implementing regulations to the FHA.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.