25 C.F.R. § 162.023

What if an individual or entity takes possession of or uses Indian land without an approved lease or other proper authorization?

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

If an individual or entity takes possession of, or uses, Indian land without a lease and a lease is required, the unauthorized possession or use is a trespass. We may take action to recover possession, including eviction, on behalf of the Indian landowners and pursue any additional remedies available under applicable law. The Indian landowners may pursue any available remedies under applicable law.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2020–2022 · leading case: Grondal v. United States of Am. (E.D. Wash. 2020).
Grondal v. United States of Am. (E.D. Wash. 2020). · cites it 3× “9 Specifically, the CTCR cite 25 C.F.R. § 162.023 , which describes what the BIA will 10 do when an individual or entity takes possession or use of Indian land, without a 11 valid lease: 12 If an individual or entity takes possession of, or uses, Indian land without a lease and…”
Grondal v. United States of Am. (E.D. Wash. 2021). · cites it 2× “1994)); see also 25 C.F.R. § 162.023 (“What if an individual or entity takes 11 possession of or uses Indian land without an approved lease or other proper 12 authorization?”).”
Hawk v. Burr (E.D. Wis. 2022). “See 25 C.F.R. § 162.023 (“If an individual or entity takes possession of, or uses, Indian land without a lease and a lease is required, the unauthorized possession or use is a trespass.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.