25 C.F.R. § 170.3
When do other requirements apply to the TTP?
TTP policies, guidance, and directives apply, to the extent permitted by law, only if they are consistent with this part and 25 CFR parts 900 and 1000. See 25 CFR 900.5 for when a Tribe must comply with other unpublished requirements.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1999–2002 · leading case: Arizona Dep't of Revenue v. Blaze Constr. Co., 526 U.S. 32 (1999).
Arizona Dep't of Revenue v. Blaze Constr. Co., 526 U.S. 32 (1999). “25 CFR § 170.3 (1998). Over a several-year period, the Bureau of Indian Affairs contracted with Blaze Construction Company to build, repair, and improve roads on the Navajo, Hopi, Fort Apache, Colorado River, Tohono O’Odham, and San Carlos Apache Indian Reservations in Arizona.”
McDonald v. Means, 309 F.3d 530 (9th Cir. 2002). “” 25 C.F.R. § 170.3 . The state recipient of the right-of-way held in Strate to constitute non-Indian fee land had no comparable duty.”
McDonald v. Means, 300 F.3d 1037 (9th Cir. 2002). “” 25 C.F.R. § 170.3 . The state recipient of the right-of-way held in Strate to constitute non-Indian fee land had no comparable duty.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.