25 C.F.R. § 290.10
Is an Indian tribe in violation of IGRA if it makes per capita payments to its members from net gaming revenues without an approved tribal revenue allocation plan?
Yes, you are in violation of IGRA if you make per capita payments to your tribal members from net gaming revenues without an approved tribal revenue allocation plan. If you refuse to comply, the DOJ or NIGC may enforce the per capita requirements of IGRA.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 2002–2006 · leading case: In Re Kedrowski, 284 B.R. 439 (Bankr. W.D. Wis. 2002).
In Re Kedrowski, 284 B.R. 439 (Bankr. W.D. Wis. 2002). “8 (tribes do not have to make per capita payments); 25 C.F.R. § 290.10 (tribe is in violation of IGRA if it makes per capita distribution without an approved tribal revenue allocation plan); 25 C.”
In Re McDonald, 353 B.R. 287 (Bankr. D. Kan. 2006). “8 (tribes do not have to make per capita payments); 25 C.F.R. § 290.10 (tribe is in violation of IGRA if it makes per capita distribution without an approved tribal revenue allocation plan); 25 C.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.