25 C.F.R. § 900.189
Does this coverage extend to subcontractors of self-determination contracts?
No. Subcontractors or subgrantees providing services to a Public Law 93-638 contractor or grantee are generally not covered. The only exceptions are Indian contractors such as those under subcontract with the California Rural Indian Health Board to carry out IHS programs in geographically defined service areas in California and personal services contracts under § 900.193 (for § 900.183(b)(1)) or § 900.183(b) (for § 900.190).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2020–2025 · leading case: Sisto v. United States (D. Ariz. 2020).
Sisto v. United States (D. Ariz. 2020). “§ 233 (a), 25 C.F.R. § 900.189 , 25 C.F.R. § 900.193 , 25 C.”
United Indian Health etc. v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd. CA1/5 (Cal. Ct. App. 2025). “50 [addressing federal laws applicable to subcontractors]; 25 C.F.R. § 900.189 [referring to “Indian contractors such as those under subcontract with the California Rural Indian Health Board”].”
United Indian Health etc. v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd. (Cal. Ct. App. 2025). “50 [addressing federal laws applicable to subcontractors]; 25 C.F.R. § 900.189 [referring to “Indian contractors such as those under subcontract with the California Rural Indian Health Board”].”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.