25 C.F.R. § 900.189

Does this coverage extend to subcontractors of self-determination contracts?

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

No. Subcontractors or subgrantees providing services to a Public Law 93-638 contractor or grantee are generally not covered. The only exceptions are Indian contractors such as those under subcontract with the California Rural Indian Health Board to carry out IHS programs in geographically defined service areas in California and personal services contracts under § 900.193 (for § 900.183(b)(1)) or § 900.183(b) (for § 900.190).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2020–2025 · leading case: Sisto v. United States (D. Ariz. 2020).
Sisto v. United States (D. Ariz. 2020). · cites it 2× “§ 233 (a), 25 C.F.R. § 900.189 , 25 C.F.R. § 900.193 , 25 C.”
United Indian Health etc. v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd. CA1/5 (Cal. Ct. App. 2025). “50 [addressing federal laws applicable to subcontractors]; 25 C.F.R. § 900.189 [referring to “Indian contractors such as those under subcontract with the California Rural Indian Health Board”].”
United Indian Health etc. v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd. (Cal. Ct. App. 2025). “50 [addressing federal laws applicable to subcontractors]; 25 C.F.R. § 900.189 [referring to “Indian contractors such as those under subcontract with the California Rural Indian Health Board”].”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.