C.F.R. » Title 27 » CHAPTER I—ALCOHOL AND TOBACCO TAX AND TRADE BUREAU, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY › SUBCHAPTER A—ALCOHOL › PART 1—BASIC PERMIT REQUIREMENTS UNDER THE FEDERAL ALCOHOL ADMINISTRATION ACT, NONINDUSTRIAL USE OF DISTILLED SPIRITS AND WINE, BULK SALES AND BOTTLING OF DISTILLED SPIRITS › Subpart C—Basic Permits

27 C.F.R. § 1.24

Qualifications of applicants

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The application of any person shall be granted and the permit issued by the appropriate TTB officer if the applicant proves to the satisfaction of the appropriate TTB officer that:

(a) Such person (or in case of a corporation, any of its officers, directors, or principal stockholders) has not, within 5 years prior to the date of application, been convicted of a felony under Federal or State law, and has not, within 3 years prior to date of application, been convicted of a misdemeanor under any Federal law relating to liquor, including the taxation thereof; and

(b) Such person, by reason of the person's business experience, financial standing or trade connections, is likely to commence operations as a distiller, warehouseman and bottler, rectifier, wine producer, wine blender, importer, or wholesaler, as the case may be, within a reasonable period and to maintain such operations in conformity with Federal law; and

(c) The operations proposed to be conducted by such person are not in violation of the law of the State in which they are to be conducted.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1947–1947 · leading case: Mid-Valley Distilling Corp. v. De Carlo, 161 F.2d 485 (3rd Cir. 1947).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Mid-Valley Distilling Corp. v. De Carlo, 161 F.2d 485 (3rd Cir. 1947). · cites it 2× “1 In this letter the Supervisor called Mid-Valley’s attention to Section 5, Article II, Regulations 1, 27 C.F.R. § 1.24 (c), quoted hereinafter.”
— 27 C.F.R. § 1.24(c) — 1 case
Mid-Valley Distilling Corp. v. De Carlo, 161 F.2d 485 (3rd Cir. 1947). “1 In this letter the Supervisor called Mid-Valley’s attention to Section 5, Article II, Regulations 1, 27 C.F.R. § 1.24 (c), quoted hereinafter.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.