27 C.F.R. § 478.126

Furnishing transaction information

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Each licensee shall, when required by letter issued by the Director of Industry Operations, and until notified to the contrary in writing by such officer, submit on Form 5300.5, Report of Firearms Transactions, for the periods and at the times specified in the letter issued by the Director of Industry Operations, all record information required by this subpart, or such lesser record information as the Director of Industry Operations in his letter may specify.

(b) The Director of Industry Operations may authorize the information to be submitted in a manner other than that prescribed in paragraph (a) of this section when it is shown by a licensee that an alternate method of reporting is reasonably necessary and will not unduly hinder the effective administration of this part. A licensee who proposes to use an alternate method of reporting shall submit a letter application, in duplicate, to the Director of Industry Operations and shall describe the proposed alternate method of reporting and the need therefor. An alternate method of reporting shall not be employed by the licensee until approval in such regard is received from the Director of Industry Operations.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1140-0032) [33 FR 18555, Dec. 14, 1968. Redesignated at 40 FR 16835, Apr. 15, 1975, and amended by T.D. ATF-172, 49 FR 14942, Apr. 16, 1984; ATF-11F, 73 FR 57242, Oct. 2, 2008; ATF 2013R-9F, 79 FR 46692, Aug. 11, 2014]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 6 cases, 2004–2016 · leading case: J & G Sales Ltd v. Carl J. Truscott, Dir., Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms & Explosives, 473 F.3d 1043 (9th Cir. 2007).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

J & G Sales Ltd v. Carl J. Truscott, Dir., Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms & Explosives, 473 F.3d 1043 (9th Cir. 2007). · cites it 3× “By the very terms of the statute, however, § 926(a) cannot be understood to limit the Bureau’s authority to issue demand letters under either § 923(g)(5)(A) or 27 C.F.R. § 478.126 (a). See Blaustein & Reich, 365 F.”

Blaustein & Reich, Inc., D/B/A Bob's Gun & Tackle Shop v. Bradley A. Buckles, Dir., Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, & Explosives, 365 F.3d 281 (4th Cir. 2004). · cites it 2× “It argues that the Bureau’s demand letter authority, which is granted by statute at § 923(g)(5)(A) and by regulation at 27 C.F.R. § 478.126 , is limited by both 18 U.”

Nat'l Shooting Sports Found., Inc. v. Melson, 840 F. Supp. 2d 310 (D.D.C. 2012). “§ 923 (g)(5)(A); see 27 C.F.R. § 478.126 . Section 923(g)(5)(A) codified an old regulation found at 33 Fed.”

J&G Sales Ltd v. Truscott (9th Cir. 2007). · cites it 3× “27 C.F.R. § 478.126 (a), which is the current incarnation of 27 C.”

Blaustein & Reich v. Buckles (4th Cir. 2004). · cites it 2× “It argues that the Bureau’s demand letter authority, which is granted by statute at § 923(g)(5)(A) and by regulation at 27 C.F.R. § 478.126 , is limited by both 18 U.”

Fairmont Cash Mgmt., LLC v. James, 208 F. Supp. 3d 830 (S.D. Tex. 2016). “§ 923 (g)(5)(A) and 27 C.F.R. § 478.126 . Similarly, from 2011 through December 2013, Cash Cow failed to timely report twelve instances where it sold two or more pistols or revolvers to the same purchaser, violating 18 U.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.