27 C.F.R. § 9.26

Guenoc Valley

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Name. The name of the viticultural area described in this section is “Guenoc Valley.”

(b) Approved maps. The appropriate maps for determining the boundaries of the Guenoc Valley viticultural area are four USGS maps. They are titled:

(1) “Middletown Quadrangle, California-Lake Co.,” 7.5 minute series;

(2) “Jericho Valley Quadrangle, California,” 7.5 minute series;

(3) “Detert Reservoir Quadrangle, California,” 7.5 minute series; and

(4) “Aetna Springs Quadrangle, California,” 7.5 minute series.

(c) Boundaries. The Guenoc Valley viticultural area is located within Lake County, California. The beginning point of the boundary is Station 20 of Denton's Survey of Guenoc Rancho, presently marked by a 1 1/2 inch galvanized pipe located atop Jim Davis Peak. On the approved maps, Jim Davis Peak is the unnamed peak (elevation 1,455 feet) located on the western boundary of Section 35, Township 11 North, Range 6 West. From this beginning point the boundary runs:

(1) South 07°49′34″ East, 9,822.57 feet to the USGS triangulation station “Guenoc;”

(2) Then, South 29°14′31″ West, 10,325.08 feet;

(3) Then, South 00°00′ West, 2,100.00 feet;

(4) Then, North 90°00′ West, 4,150.00 feet;

(5) Then, North 24°23′11″ West, 16,469.36 feet;

(6) Then, North 75°47′20″ East, 7,943.08 feet; and

(7) Then, North 60°47′00″ East, 7,970.24 feet to the beginning point.

[T.D. ATF-95, 46 FR 56786, Nov. 19, 1981]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2005–2005 · leading case: Bronco Wine Co. v. Jolly, 29 Cal. Rptr. 3d 462 (Cal. Ct. App. 2005).
Bronco Wine Co. v. Jolly, 29 Cal. Rptr. 3d 462 (Cal. Ct. App. 2005). “) With respect to the subappellations within Napa County, Bronco complains that the statute allows smaller viticultural appellations within Napa County to use the general Napa County appellation requirement rather than the more limited viticultural appellation within the county…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.