28 C.F.R. § 0.104

Redelegation of authority

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration is authorized to redelegate to any of his subordinates or any of the officers or employees of the Immigration and Naturalization Service any of the powers and functions vested in him by this subpart R.

[Order No. 1146-86, 51 FR 30485, Aug. 27, 1986]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1981–2012 · leading case: Morall v. Drug Enf't Admin., 412 F.3d 165 (D.C. Cir. 2005).
Morall v. Drug Enf't Admin., 412 F.3d 165 (D.C. Cir. 2005). “100 (b) (2004), and redelegated to the Deputy Administrator, see 28 C.F.R. § 0.104 & App. § 12 (2004). Act authorizes suspension or revocation of a certificate of registration where the registrant “has committed such acts as would render his registration under section 823 of…”
United States v. Golden Valley Elec. Ass'n, 689 F.3d 1108 (9th Cir. 2012). “The Attorney General has delegated his authority under § 876 to DEA agents. See 21 U.”
MacKay v. Drug Enf't Admin., 664 F.3d 808 (10th Cir. 2011). “100 (b), and redelegated to the Deputy Administrator, see 28 C.F.R. § 0.104 & App. § 12. 2 .The Controlled Substances Act classifies controlled substances in five schedules.”
United States v. Mountain States Tel. & Tel. Co., 516 F. Supp. 225 (D. Wyo. 1981). “28 C.F.R. 0.104, Appendix to subpart R, Section 7.”
Olsen v. Holder, 610 F. Supp. 2d 985 (S.D. Iowa 2009). “The Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration has, in turn, delegated this authority to the Deputy Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration, pursuant to 28 C.F. R. § 0.104. See App. to Subpart R, § 12.”
Penick Corp. v. Drug Enf't Admin., 491 F.3d 483 (D.C. Cir. 2007). “100 (b), who, in turn, delegated it to the DEA Deputy Administrator, see 28 C.F.R. § 0.104 , App. § 7(j). 2 . Section 1301.”
United States v. Perkins, 177 F. Supp. 2d 570 (W.D. Tex. 2001). “28 C.F.R. § 0.104 (emphasis added). The Attorney General's authority to allow redele gation has as its source 28 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.