28 C.F.R. § 14.11

Supplementing regulations

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Each agency is authorized to issue regulations and establish procedures consistent with the regulations in this part.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases (5 in the last 5 years), 1981–2025 · leading case: Est. of Eleusipa Van Emburgh v. United States, 95 F.4th 795 (4th Cir. 2024).
Est. of Eleusipa Van Emburgh v. United States, 95 F.4th 795 (4th Cir. 2024). · cites it 2× “See 28 C.F.R. § 14.11 (“Each agency is authorized to issue regulations and establish procedures consistent with the regulations in this part.”
Robert Wayne Dotson v. United States, 30 F.4th 1259 (11th Cir. 2022). “329; see also 28 C.F.R. § 14.11 (“Each agency is authorized to issue regulations and establish procedures consistent with the regulations in this part.”
Hoaglan v. United States, 510 F. Supp. 1058 (N.D. Iowa 1981). “is found at 28 CFR § 14.11 . Furthermore, 31 CFR § 3.”
Pagel v. United States, 986 F. Supp. 1315 (N.D. Cal. 1997). · cites it 2× “” 28 C.F.R. § 14.11 . The Postal Service regulations for handling claims, 39 C.”
Vincent v. United States (M.D. Fla. 2025). · cites it 2× “The second are regulations promulgated by the USPS and other federal agencies pursuant to 28 C.F.R. § 14.11 that authorize the agencies to adopt their own supplemental rules governing the administration of the FTCA claims before them.”
Sexton v. United States (S.D.W. Va 2023). “See 28 C.F.R. § 14.11 (“Each agency is authorized to issue regulations and establish procedures consistent with the regulations in this part.”
Rose v. United States (M.D. Fla. 2025). “2022); see 28 C.F.R. § 14.11 (“Each agency is authorized to issue regulations and establish procedures consistent with the regulations [regarding administrative claims under the FTCA].”
Navarro v. United States, 586 F. Supp. 799 (D.V.I. 1984). · cites it 2× “§ 301 and 28 C.F.R. 14.11 (1966). The FTCA clearly spells out four specific requirements pertaining to the necessary pre-suit submission of administrative claims.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.