C.F.R. » Title 28 » CHAPTER I—DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE › PART 2—PAROLE, RELEASE, SUPERVISION AND RECOMMITMENT OF PRISONERS, YOUTH OFFENDERS, AND JUVENILE DELINQUENTS › Subpart C—District of Columbia Code: Prisoners and Parolees

28 C.F.R. § 2.97

Withdrawal of order of release

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

If, after an order for release from active supervision under former § 2.95 has been issued by the Commission, and prior to the expiration date of the sentence(s) being served, the parolee commits any new criminal offense or engages in any conduct that might bring discredit to the parole system, the Commission may, in its discretion, do any of the following:

(a) Issue a summons or warrant to commence the revocation process;

(b) Withdraw the order of release from supervision and return the parolee to active supervision; or

(c) Impose any special conditions to the order of release from supervision.

[65 FR 45888, July 26, 2000, as amended at 74 FR 28605, June 17, 2009; 75 FR 9520, Mar. 3, 2010]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2016–2016 · leading case: Varner v. United States Parole Comm'n (D.D.C. 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Varner v. United States Parole Comm'n (D.D.C. 2016). “Varner was “released from active supervision,” but he remained subject to the Commission’s authority pursuant 28 C.F.R. § 2.97 , until the expiration of his maximum or full-term sentence on October 9, 2018.”
Varner v. United States Parole Comm'n (D.D.C. 2016). “Varner was “released from active supervision,” but he remained subject to the Commission’s authority pursuant 28 C.F.R. § 2.97 , until the expiration of his maximum or full-term sentence on October 9, 2018.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.