28 C.F.R. § 36.306
Personal devices and services
This part does not require a public accommodation to provide its customers, clients, or participants with personal devices, such as wheelchairs; individually prescribed devices, such as prescription eyeglasses or hearing aids; or services of a personal nature including assistance in eating, toileting, or dressing.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2005–2026 · leading case: John Karczewski v. Dch Mission Valley LLC, 862 F.3d 1006 (9th Cir. 2017).
John Karczewski v. Dch Mission Valley LLC, 862 F.3d 1006 (9th Cir. 2017). “” Defendant next points to 28 C.F.R. § 36.306 , which states: This part does not require a public accommodation to provide its customers, clients, or participants with personal devices, such as wheelchairs; individually prescribed devices, such as prescription eyeglasses or…”
Alumni Cruises, LLC v. Carnival Corp., 987 F. Supp. 2d 1290 (S.D. Fla. 2013). “Nor, as Carnival suggests, do the proposed modifications require Carnival to provide “services of a personal nature” that 28 C.F.R. § 36.306 states that public accommodations need not make available.”
Dryer v. Flower Hosp., 383 F. Supp. 2d 934 (N.D. Ohio 2005). “” 28 C.F.R. § 36.306 . In the case before the Court today, that is exactly what Plaintiff required: an individually prescribed device.”
Ass'n for Disabled Americans v. Key Largo Bay Beach, LLC, 407 F. Supp. 2d 1321 (S.D. Fla. 2005). “Under 28 CFR 36.306, however, a public accommodation is not required to furnish personal devices, such as wheelchairs, to disabled patrons.”
De Camara v. Bryn Mawr Coll. (E.D. Pa. 2025). “Ohio 2005) (citing 28 C.F.R. § 36.306 ) (finding a hospital was not required to provide a non-patient—who a doctor had prescribed oxygen to assist with her breathing—with oxygen from the hospital).”
Alexander Sims Jr. v. Caesars Virginia, LLC (W.D. Va. 2026). “See 28 C.F.R. § 36.306 (noting that the ADA “does not require a public accommodation to provide its customers, clients, or participants with personal devices, such as wheelchairs”).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.