C.F.R. » Title 28 » CHAPTER V—BUREAU OF PRISONS, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE › SUBCHAPTER B—INMATE ADMISSION, CLASSIFICATION, AND TRANSFER › PART 524—CLASSIFICATION OF INMATES › Subpart F—Central Inmate Monitoring (CIM) System

28 C.F.R. § 524.75

Periodic review

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The Warden shall ensure that the status of an inmate's CIM assignment is considered at each program review. When staff believe that removal or modification of a CIM classification is appropriate, the institution's CMC and the appropriate reviewing authority must be notified. Only the reviewing authority shall determine if removal or modification of the CIM classification is appropriate.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2022–2023 · leading case: Martin v. United States (D. Colo. 2022).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Martin v. United States (D. Colo. 2022). “See 28 C.F.R. § 524.75 . The Tenth Circuit has not spoken on whether § 524.”
Martin v. United States (D. Colo. 2023). “73 (setting forth procedures in the classification of inmates); 28 C.F.R. § 524.75 (mandating periodic review of an inmate’s CIM assignment).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.