C.F.R. » Title 28 » CHAPTER I—DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE › PART 68—RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE FOR ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS BEFORE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES IN CASES INVOLVING ALLEGATIONS OF UNLAWFUL EMPLOYMENT OF ALIENS, UNFAIR IMMIGRATION-RELATED EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES, AND DOCUMENT FRAUD

28 C.F.R. § 68.56

Judicial review of a final agency order in cases arising under section 274A or 274C

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

In cases arising under section 274A or 274C of the INA, a person or entity adversely affected by a final agency order issued under § 68.52(c) or (e), § 68.54(e), or § 68.55(d) may file, within forty-five (45) days after the date of the final agency order, a petition in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit for review of the final agency order. Failure to request review by the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer of a final order by an Administrative Law Judge shall not prevent a party from seeking judicial review.

[Order No. 2203-99, 64 FR 7083, Feb. 12, 1999, as amended by AG Order No.5812-2023, 88 FR 70591, Oct. 12, 2023]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2016–2017 · leading case: Split Rail Fence Co. v. United States, 852 F.3d 1228 (10th Cir. 2017).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Split Rail Fence Co. v. United States, 852 F.3d 1228 (10th Cir. 2017). “28 C.F.R. § 68.56 . C. Factual and Procedural History 1.”
Split Rail Fence Co. v. United States, 844 F.3d 880 (10th Cir. 2016). “28 C.F.R. § 68.56 . C. Factual and Procedural History 1.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.