29 C.F.R. § 101.1

General statement

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The following statements of the general course and method by which the Board's functions are channeled and determined are issued and published pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(1)(B).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1970–1993 · leading case: Miles T. Jackman v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 784 F.2d 759 (6th Cir. 1986).
Miles T. Jackman v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 784 F.2d 759 (6th Cir. 1986). “, 29 C.F.R. §§ 101.1 et seq. provide two approaches to settlement of unresolved pending complaints charging unfair labor practices.”
Crawford v. TRW, INC., 815 F. Supp. 1028 (E.D. Mich. 1993). “247, pursuant to NLRA regulations, 29 C.F.R. § 101.1 et seq., on the union bulletin boards at TRW’s Van Dyke plant.”
Int'l Ladies' Garment Workers Union, Local 415-475, Afl-Cio v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 501 F.2d 823 (D.C. Cir. 1974). “, 29 C.F.R. § 101.1 et seq. (1973). 12 . Id.”
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Maine Sugar Indus., Inc., 425 F.2d 942 (1st Cir. 1970). “Moreover, we are unwilling to charge parties with knowledge of all the procedural niceties tangentially enunciated in the Board’s decisions when the Board’s rules and regulations — 29 C.F.R. §§ 101.1 et seq., 102.1 et seq.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.