C.F.R. » Title 29 » CHAPTER I—NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD › PART 101—STATEMENTS OF PROCEDURES › Subpart D—Unfair Labor Practice and Representation Cases Under Sections 8(b)(7) and 9(c) of the Act

29 C.F.R. § 101.22

Initiation and investigation of a case under section 8(b)(7)

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The investigation of an alleged violation of section 8(b)(7) of the Act is initiated by the filing of a charge. The manner of filing such charge and the contents thereof are the same as described in § 101.2. In some cases, at the time of the investigation of the charge, there may be pending a representation petition involving the employees of the employer named in the charge. In those cases, the results of the investigation of the charge will determine the cause of the petition.

(b) The investigation of the charge is conducted in accordance with the provisions of § 101.4, insofar as they are applicable. If the investigation reveals that there is merit in the charge, a complaint is issued as described in § 101.8, and an application is made for an injunction under section 10(1) of the Act, as described in § 101.37. If the investigation reveals that there is no merit in the charge, the Regional Director, absent a withdrawal of the charge, dismisses it, subject to appeal to the General Counsel. However, if the investigation reveals that issuance of a complaint may be warranted but for the pendency of a representation petition involving the employees of the employer named in the charge, action on the charge is suspended pending the investigation of the petition as provided in § 101.23.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2015–2015 · leading case: Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. United Food & Com. Workers Int'l Union, 354 P.3d 31 (Wash. Ct. App. 2015).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. United Food & Com. Workers Int'l Union, 354 P.3d 31 (Wash. Ct. App. 2015). “29 C.F.R. § 101.22 . ¶23 Washington courts have not yet expressly ruled on whether trespass is a matter of deeply rooted local interest, although Walmart cites several Washington cases discussing property rights and trespass.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.