29 C.F.R. § 102.57
Extension of date of hearing
Upon the Regional Director's own motion or upon proper cause shown, the Regional Director issuing the compliance specification and Notice of Hearing may extend the hearing date.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1957–1988 · leading case: NLRB v. Ironworkers, 466 U.S. 720 (1984).
NLRB v. Ironworkers, 466 U.S. 720 (1984). “In the present case, the Court of Appeals has limited the *725 class of employees to whom backpay may be awarded and has prohibited the Board from amending its backpay specification as the Board's regulations would permit, see 29 CFR § 102.57 (1983). Nonetheless, the principle…”
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Int'l Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Ironworkers, Local 480, 466 U.S. 720 (1984). “In the present case, the Court of Appeals has limited the *725 class of employees to whom backpay may be awarded and has prohibited the Board from amending its backpay specification as the Board’s regulations would permit, see 29 CFR § 102.57 (1983). Nonetheless, the principle…”
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Duval Jewelry Co. of Miami, Inc., 243 F.2d 427 (5th Cir. 1957). “57 (c) of the Board’s Rules, 29 C.F.R. § 102.57 (c), 29 U.S. C.A.Appendix.”
Kawasaki Motors Mfg. Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 850 F.2d 524 (9th Cir. 1988). “” 29 C.F.R. § 102.57 (1987). Although we agree that the General Counsel should have raised the promotion issue in a more timely manner, we find that Kawasaki was not prejudiced by the delay.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.