C.F.R. » Title 29 » CHAPTER XIV—EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION › PART 1602—RECORDKEEPING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS UNDER TITLE VII, THE ADA, GINA, AND THE PWFA › Subpart M—Elementary-Secondary Staff Information Report

29 C.F.R. § 1602.41

Requirement for filing and preserving copy of report

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

On or before November 30, 1982, and biennially thereafter, certain public elementary and secondary school systems and districts, including individually or separately administered districts within such systems, shall file with the Commission or its delegate executed copies of Elementary-Secondary Staff Information Report EEO-5 in conformity with the directions set forth in the form and accompanying instructions. The elementary and secondary school systems and districts covered are:

(a) Every one of those which have 100 or more employees, and

(b) Every one of those others which have 15 or more employees from whom the Commission requests the filing of reports.

Every such elementary or secondary school system or district shall retain at all times, for a period of 3 years, a copy of the most recently filed report EEO-5 at the central office of the school system or district, and shall make the same available if requested by an officer, agent, or employee of the Commission under the authority of section 710 of title VII, as amended. It is the responsibility of the school systems or districts above described in this section to obtain from the Commission or its delegate necessary supplies of the form. [48 FR 8058, Feb. 25, 1983, as amended at 61 FR 33660, June 28, 1996]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2014–2014 · leading case: Maryland Attorney Gen. Opinion 99OAG088 (Md. Att'y Gen. 2014).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Maryland Attorney Gen. Opinion 99OAG088 (Md. Att'y Gen. 2014). “33659 (June 28, 1996) (amending 29 C.F.R. § 1602.41 ). According to current MSDE staff, MSDE continued to review the school-system-wide EEO-5 forms which were submitted biennially.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.