C.F.R. » Title 29 » PART 18—RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE FOR ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS BEFORE THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES › Subpart B—Rules of Evidence

29 C.F.R. § 18.102

Purpose and construction

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

These rules shall be construed to secure fairness in administration, elimination of unjustifiable expense and delay, and promotion of growth and development of the law of evidence to the end that the truth may be ascertained and proceedings justly determined.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2023–2023 · leading case: Darren Kossen v. Asian Pac. Airlines (9th Cir. 2023).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Darren Kossen v. Asian Pac. Airlines (9th Cir. 2023). “See 29 C.F.R. § 18.102 (establishing that an ALJ should set rules to “secure fairness in administration, elimination of unjustifiable expense and delay”).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.