29 C.F.R. § 4.1

Purpose and scope

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

This part contains the Department of Labor's rules relating to the administration of the McNamara-O'Hara Service Contract Act of 1965, as amended, referred to hereinafter as the Act. Rules of practice for administrative proceedings under the Act and for the review of wage determinations are contained in parts 6 and 8 of this chapter. See part 1925 of this title for the safety and health standards applicable under the Service Contract Act.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1978–2022 · leading case: Nina Michael v. Shiley, Inc. Hosp. Prods. Grp., Inc., (Formerly Howmedica, Inc.) Pfizer, Inc, 46 F.3d 1316 (3rd Cir. 1995).
Nina Michael v. Shiley, Inc. Hosp. Prods. Grp., Inc., (Formerly Howmedica, Inc.) Pfizer, Inc, 46 F.3d 1316 (3rd Cir. 1995). “§ 351 ; 29 C.F.R. §§ 4.1 to 4.51; 29 C.F.R. § 5.5 .”
Trinity Servs., Inc., a Florida Corp. v. F. Ray Marshall, Sec'y of Labor, 593 F.2d 1250 (D.C. Cir. 1978). “29 C.F.R. § 4.1 et seq. (1977). . 29 C.F.”
Vigilantes, Inc. v. Adm'r of Wage & Hour Div., U.S. Dep't of Labor, 968 F.2d 1412 (1st Cir. 1992). “29 C.F.R. § 4.1 et seq. . 41 U.S.C. § 354 (a).”
Burnside-Ott Aviation Training Ctr., Inc. v. United States, 24 Cl. Ct. 553 (Ct. Cl. 1991). “29 C.F.R. § 4.1 (1990). The Service Contract Act provides, in part, as follows: (a) Every contract .”
BCFS Health & Human Servs. v. United States Dep't of Labor (W.D. Tex. 2022). · cites it 2× “…that provide a comprehensive administrative scheme for implementing and enforcing the Act’s requirements. See 29 C.F.R. §§ 4.1 et seq., §§ 6.1 et seq., §§ 8.1 et seq. By statute, covered contracts must contain specific terms, including provisions “specifying the…”
Bailey v. Dejoy (D. Me. 2021). “§ 6703 (1)-(2); 29 C.F.R. § 4.1 et seq. The Act also requires that any contracted services are not to be “performed in buildings or surroundings or under working conditions .”
Michael v. Shiley, Inc. (3rd Cir. 1995). “§ 351 ; 29 C.F.R. §§ 4.1 to 4.51; 29 C.F.R § 5.5.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.