C.F.R. » Title 29 » CHAPTER IV—OFFICE OF LABOR-MANAGEMENT STANDARDS, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR › SUBCHAPTER A—LABOR-MANAGEMENT STANDARDS › PART 451—LABOR ORGANIZATIONS AS DEFINED IN THE LABOR-MANAGEMENT REPORTING AND DISCLOSURE ACT OF 1959

29 C.F.R. § 451.2

General

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

A “labor organization” under the Act must qualify under section 3(i). It must also be engaged in an industry affecting commerce. In accordance with the broad language used and the manifest congressional intent, the language will be construed broadly to include all labor organizations of any kind other than those clearly shown to be outside the scope of the Act.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1979–2022 · leading case: Alabama Educ. Ass'n v. Chao, 595 F. Supp. 2d 93 (D.D.C. 2009).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Alabama Educ. Ass'n v. Chao, 595 F. Supp. 2d 93 (D.D.C. 2009). “In conformity with the Department’s view that the definitional sections of the LMRDA should be read “to include all labor organizations of any kind other than those clearly shown to be outside the scope of the LMRDA,” 29 C.F.R. § 451.2 , the Department has construed…”
Roddy v. United Transp. Union, 479 F. Supp. 57 (N.D. Ala. 1979). “29 C.F.R. § 451.2 . Regardless of whether it deals with employers concerning terms and conditions of employment and regardless of whether it is composed of employees, any conference, general committee, joint or system board, or joint council engaged in an industry affecting…”
Donovan v. Nat'l Transient Div., 736 F.2d 618 (10th Cir. 1984). “News 2318, 2370 (emphasis added); see also 29 C.F.R. § 451.2 . Thus, if the organization represents its members regarding grievances, labor disputes, or terms or conditions of employment, the organization is subject to the Act regardless of its formal attributes, see *622…”
Murdock v. Am. Mar. Officers Union Nat'l Exec. Bd. (S.D. Fla. 2022). “1979) (quoting 29 C.F.R. § 451.2 ). In other words, the LMRDA’s purpose is expansive.”
Alabama Educ. Ass'n v. Chao (D.D.C. 2009). “In conformity with the Department’s view that the definitional sections of the LMRDA should be read “to include all labor organizations of any kind other than those clearly shown to be outside the scope of the LMRDA,” 29 C.F.R. § 451.2 , the Department has construed…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.