C.F.R. » Title 29 » CHAPTER V—WAGE AND HOUR DIVISION, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR › SUBCHAPTER B—STATEMENTS OF GENERAL POLICY OR INTERPRETATION NOT DIRECTLY RELATED TO REGULATIONS › PART 778—OVERTIME COMPENSATION › Subpart A—General Considerations

29 C.F.R. § 778.4

Reliance on interpretations

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The interpretations of the law contained in this part 778 are official interpretations which may be relied upon as provided in section 10 of the Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947 (61 Stat. 84).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1995–1995 · leading case: Abbey v. City of Jackson, 883 F. Supp. 181 (E.D. Mich. 1995).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Abbey v. City of Jackson, 883 F. Supp. 181 (E.D. Mich. 1995). “If I were to accept defendant's interpretation, either § 207(e)(5) or § 207(e)(7) would be superfluous. 5 . 29 C.F.R. § 553.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.