C.F.R. » Title 30 » CHAPTER II—BUREAU OF SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENFORCEMENT, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR › SUBCHAPTER C—APPEALS › PART 290—APPEAL PROCEDURES › Subpart A—Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement Appeal Procedures

30 C.F.R. § 290.2

Who may appeal?

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

If you are adversely affected by a BSEE official's final decision or order issued under 30 CFR chapter II, you may appeal that decision or order to the Interior Board of Land Appeals (IBLA). Your appeal must conform with the procedures found in this subpart and 43 CFR part 4, subpart E.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1981–2011 · leading case: Alaska Wilderness League v. Kempthorne, 548 F.3d 815 (9th Cir. 2008).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Alaska Wilderness League v. Kempthorne, 548 F.3d 815 (9th Cir. 2008). · cites it 8× “However, since NSB and REDOIL utilized the administrative appeal process, the sixty-day deadline did not begin to run on February 15, 2007.”
Aera Energy LLC v. Salazar, 642 F.3d 212 (D.C. Cir. 2011). “30 C.F.R. § 290.2 . In contrast, our other cases have all had “parties on both sides,” making it “inevitable that .”
Copper Valley Mach. Works, Inc. v. Cecil D. Andrus, Sec'y of the Dep't of Interior, 653 F.2d 595 (D.C. Cir. 1981). “Thus, assuming without deciding that the Supervisor’s September 2 letter was a “final order or decision” that “adversely affected” Copper Valley, 30 C.F.R. § 290.2 (1979), the Secretary failed to treat it as such and cannot do so now.”
Getty Oil Co. v. Clark, 614 F. Supp. 904 (D. Wyo. 1985). “§ 226-2 ; 30 C.F.R. §§ 290.2 (1979); Copper Valley Mach.”
Atl. Richfield Co. v. Lujan, 811 F. Supp. 1520 (N.D. Okla. 1992). “” 30 C.F.R. 290.2. In addition, any party “adversely affected by a final decision of the Director, Minerals Management Service,” has a further “right of appeal to the Board of Land Appeals [IBLA] in the Office of Hearings and Appeals.”
Alaska Wilderness v. Kempthorne (9th Cir. 2008). · cites it 3× “NSB and REDOIL filed an optional appeal of the agency’s decision with the IBLA on April 13, 2007, pursuant to 30 C.F.R. § 290.2 . This optional appeal was filed within the sixty-day timeline established by 30 C.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.