30 C.F.R. § 75.300

Scope

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

This subpart sets requirements for underground coal mine ventilation.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1991–2019 · leading case: Susie Myers Perkins, Adm'x of the Est. of John David Perkins, Jr., Deceased v. United States, 55 F.3d 910 (4th Cir. 1995).
Susie Myers Perkins, Adm'x of the Est. of John David Perkins, Jr., Deceased v. United States, 55 F.3d 910 (4th Cir. 1995). “Claiming that Perkins’s death was caused by the negligence of the United States and its agents in numerous particulars, including violating federal and state regulations governing coal mining, 30 C.F.R. §§ 75.300 , et seq., W.Va.Code §§ 22A-2-3, et seq.”
Peabody Twentymile Mining v. Sec'y of Labor, 931 F.3d 992 (10th Cir. 2019). “2008) (citing 30 C.F.R. §§ 75.300 - 75.389 ). These regulations set forth generally applicable standards for mine ventilation systems and require each mine operator to develop and follow a mine-specific ventilation control plan, which must be approved by an MSHA district manager.”
Utah Power & Light Co., Mining Div. v. Sec'y of Labor & Fed. Mine Saf. & Health Review Comm'n, 951 F.2d 292 (10th Cir. 1991). “When petitioner sent a copy of its program to the Mine Safety and Health Administration it was returned. Petitioner’s brief p. 14, p. 32. On the other hand, the company’s ventilation program must be approved by the Coal Mine Safety District Manager.”
Perkins v. United States, 848 F. Supp. 1236 (S.D.W. Va 1994). “The plaintiff claims that the death of Perkins was due to the negligence of the United States and its agents in numerous particulars, including various violations of federal regulations governing coal mining, 30 C.F.R. §§ 75.300 , et seq., and in failure to notify the Mine…”
Mike Sumpter v. Sec'y of Labor, Fed. Mine Saf. & Health Review Comm'n, 763 F.3d 1292 (11th Cir. 2014). “§ 863(a), (o); see also 30 C.F.R. § 75.300 et seq. (ventilation standards for underground coal mines).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.